rant · moment 4 of 18

In Defense of the Sackler Family

from The Vast Majority | The Tim Dillon Show #361 · #361

17 min

A long rant defending the Sacklers as unfairly scapegoated compared to other pharma and military-industrial players, tying in Painkiller on Netflix, his mother's past as a pharma rep, RFK Jr.'s crusade against pharma advertising, and a lengthy digression on drug use, calling for people to "handle their drugs" and stick to Percocet/Vicodin instead of OxyContin.

In this bit11 moments
  • Tim mounts a defense of the Sackler family, noting no one else has done so.
  • The Sacklers created a product that worked too well—the problem was its own effectiveness.
  • The Sackler wing at the Museum of Natural History is beautiful, raising the question of what wealthy families do with their money.
  • Military industrial complex money is accepted by institutions, but pharmaceutical money from the Sacklers is rejected as tainted.
  • Tim observes the Sacklers appear to be scapegoated—the only family everyone focuses on as uniquely evil.
  • Tim has been sober for 12 years and advocates for realistic harm reduction rather than abstinence-only messaging.
  • A friend's mother—a brilliant prostitute—taught them at 13 to handle their drugs properly, a lesson about moderation.
  • When rich families collectively evict and blacklist one family, they're performing a ritual to protect their cartel while sacrificing one member.
  • RFK is attacked for targeting the pharmaceutical industry because it's the most profitable in America and deeply fused with public health messaging.
  • Cable news won't let RFK criticize pharma because their advertisers are pharmaceutical companies targeting ancient viewers.
  • Tim enjoyed the Painkiller Netflix series and doesn't think the Sacklers are upstanding people, but neither is anyone else in that world.
Mentioned here

Sackler familyRFK JrBoeingMuseum of Natural HistoryPainkillerConnecticut

All 18 moments in this episode →