rant · moment 3 of 28
New York Times 'No Evidence' Epstein Hedging
from Donald Trump’s Endgame | The Tim Dillon Show #501 · #501
2 min
Tim previews the interview, praising Swan and Haberman while poking at how New York Times reporters insist there's 'no evidence' of Epstein intelligence ties despite obvious circumstantial signs.
- New York Times reporters claim they have no evidence of Epstein's intelligence connections, which Tim says is technically false phrasing.
- Tim explains what the reporters mean: they weren't in the room, so they can't personally verify it, even though evidence exists.
- Tim acknowledges the Times has standards he respects, but notes there is evidence—just perhaps not enough for a courtroom conviction.
- Tim appreciated the New York Times reporters coming on the show, calling them "the big dogs."
- As summer approaches, Tim doubts anyone will care about the Epstein story, and admits he doesn't care about it either while doing the interview.