The Slippery Slope of Data Surveillance and Predictive Ads

• 19:15Tim compares DNA collection to Holocaust-era surveillance, arguing it could make future genocides more efficient.
• 19:42Insurance companies could use genetic data to raise premiums based on predicted health risks.
• 20:17The real concern isn't today's privacy violations but what governments might justify tomorrow under the guise of societal benefit.
• 20:53Tim extrapolates: future judicial nominees could be disqualified based on DNA sequencing and social media posts reviewed by the Senate.
• 21:31Current data collection primarily serves advertising and marketing, which Tim finds grotesque but somewhat benign compared to potential future abuses.
• 21:48Tim's surveillance paranoia story: someone gave him a Stella Artois glass, and an hour and a half later he saw an ad for it on Facebook.
• 22:52A woman gave Tim a dollar and said "God bless you, sir," and then he went home and saw a TD Bank ad—something suspicious is definitely happening.
• 23:11The next step beyond marketing is using data to group people as potential problems and justify surveillance on those designated as risks.
• 23:27Authorities will justify mass surveillance by claiming it fights crime, however they choose to define the term.

Facebookgenetic surveillance and authoritarianismDNA privacy and surveillanceHolocaustTD Bank